介绍： At some point, for the sake of our children, the policies must take priority over the personalities. So, because you have an issue with President Trump's tone, you're going to allow Biden and Harris to deny our underserved black and brown children school choice. There has never been a bigger embrace of giving...

介绍： At some point, for the sake of our children, the policies must take priority over the personalities. So, because you have an issue with President Trump's tone, you're going to allow Biden and Harris to deny our underserved black and brown children school choice. There has never been a bigger embrace of giving parents the opportunity to choose which school they want to send their children to and making their tax dollars portable to meet their decision, whether it be public or private or religious. Any of those choices. Now, COVID-19 has heightened this issue because a lot of parents are teaching from home and they're becoming better acquainted than ever with what their kids are learning and what they're not being taught in school. So, The Wall Street Journal wrote a very powerful piece on this today. And part of that piece says this: "...parents are also discovering the woke political bias that passes for education in too many schools. In Philadelphia, a public-school teacher tweeted his concern that 'conservative parents' listening in 'are my chief concern'.

在某种程度上，为了孩子的利益，我们制定的政策是比发动人身攻击重要的。你们对特朗普总统的语气有意见，所以你们就能接受拜登和哈里斯去否认底层深色皮肤小孩选择学校的权利。父母有权选择把孩子送到哪所学校，交的税还可以用于满足他们的决定，不管是公立、私立还是宗教学校都可以，这是以前没有过的。如今，新冠疫情加剧了这一问题，因为许多家长在家里给孩子上课，他们对孩子学了什么、在学校没有教什么都更加了解了。《华尔街日报》今天发表了一篇非常强有力的文章。文章里的其中几句是：“家长还发现，被唤醒的政治偏见在许多学校里被视作教育。在费城，一所公立学校的老师在推特上发布了自己的观点，说‘保守的父母’听到的‘是我主要关心的’。