介绍： The results? In every case, volunteers listening to music solved fewer puzzles than their counterparts in total quiet. Suggesting that background music does not really aid this kind of creative task. Maybe because these puzzles require some sort of mental speech rehearsal—trying out different word combos usi...

介绍： The results? In every case, volunteers listening to music solved fewer puzzles than their counterparts in total quiet. Suggesting that background music does not really aid this kind of creative task. Maybe because these puzzles require some sort of mental speech rehearsal—trying out different word combos using your inner voice.

"And therefore they're more susceptible to changing state sounds such as music, in comparison to steady state sounds such as library noise."
And in fact, the researchers tested library noise too, (library noise) like the sounds of typing and rustling papers. And none of those noises impaired volunteers' performance at all, compared to the silent control group. The results are in the journal Applied Cognitive Psychology.
Still, if you do insist on listening to music while working, you might try something a little more low-key than Lady Gaga, says Threadgold's colleague John Marsh:
"So if you have a sound with a lot of changing state information in it, changes in pitch or in timbre, that's more disruptive than a sound with fewer of those changes. So if you compared a modern pop song with some classical music you'd expect less disruption from that classical music."
Even better, though, would be the sound of silence. (Simon and Garfunkel's "Sound of Silence" clip briefly then stops) As in, actual silence.

“因此，与图书馆噪音等稳态声音相比，他们更容易受到音乐等变化态声音的影响。”
事实上，研究人员还对图书馆噪音（图书馆噪音）、打字声以及纸张的沙沙声进行了测试。与安静环境的对照组相比，这些噪音丝毫没有损害志愿者的表现。研究结果发表在《应用认知心理学》期刊上。
不过，斯莱德古德的同事约翰·马什表示，如果你坚持边听音乐边工作，你可以尝试比Lady Gaga的歌曲更低调的音乐：
“如果你听的音乐中有很多高音或音色方面的变化态信息，那这种音乐比信息少的声音更具干扰性。如果你把现代流行歌曲与某些古典音乐进行比较，你会发现古典音乐的干扰较少。”
不过，更好的还是“寂静之声”。（西蒙和加芬克尔的《寂静之声》片段短暂播放后停止）就像真正置身于无声状态一样。