介绍： 最高院认为，禁止律师直接发信件给即将要被拆迁的居民违反第一修正案。
从此，律师可以在法律允许的范围内打广告。（注：我国律师不能打广告。）
Yes. In a 6-3 decision, Justice William J. Brennan wrote the majority opinion, holding the Kentucky Supreme Court rule unconstitutional. The Supreme Court did not decide whet...

介绍： 最高院认为，禁止律师直接发信件给即将要被拆迁的居民违反第一修正案。
从此，律师可以在法律允许的范围内打广告。（注：我国律师不能打广告。）
Yes. In a 6-3 decision, Justice William J. Brennan wrote the majority opinion, holding the Kentucky Supreme Court rule unconstitutional. The Supreme Court did not decide whether Shapero’s letter required First Amendment protections. The Court remanded the case for further consideration of that issue. Justice Byron R. White wrote a concurrence, stating that the question of whether Shapero’s letter required First Amendment protections should be left to state courts.