介绍： Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council
著名的“谢弗林尊重”来自本案。

Paul M. Bator
Mr. Chief Justice, and may it please the Court, this case involves the validity of an important regulation issued by the Environmental Protection Agency under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977.

The reg...

介绍： Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council
著名的“谢弗林尊重”来自本案。

Paul M. Bator
Mr. Chief Justice, and may it please the Court, this case involves the validity of an important regulation issued by the Environmental Protection Agency under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977.

The regulation addresses the question of what counts as a "source" for purposes of activating a permit program called the new source review program.

Under the statute, the states must impose new source review in certain areas of the country in situations where construction or modification of a major stationary source of air pollution would lead to significant emissions increases, and the question is: What is a source?